t.R qztrffv-WITiq
x(r‘rzt Uttiii/14): xiraik‘ff kar-t 9717 a r 749tha
Mar 9411
FETT111 T:417.7 i TrzffitTe sfisT. t
1 447-
94 4 kart
4 a-qr i greekia.
49 149T t I*17 u
1
917717 tt 371F9
415t, l * 9ferfka4
t--q >ih 941 t
kurk aita 4
917 TT 14T FIVT ?Our
TeTtRITT a4l TT ter
ITN ?
xceirfq 777 79 79T719T91rot oAccird
*t
979k *1479 17(7
991919 TT a7T Hbe I O.-- atm. 4
a4PEIT
4 79T 71794 t 917 4W7T977 *9a-a9 q ra
TT
Kq1T9'
q77 - t I aurra Wfk Tra 0 T14T kar.a. z,r;fi 4 rrEF act t 1
979T4
7W117 79 M14 77 "4-thaST19-4":" 1 ko
Trir
fff94
F4T91 99-197-7 W'
t aw 4 ate Wnrq TriftETWT 7114.,
q4)Ti x 92-Fr, gra:m. 4rTrv5 ark k.la fE-6 tcf
qa 9t 444T
744 07, w 4t 1444 74 47*
'4TTETT FdITft '41 ujh 9;14
t I cmg
7177 Zitt9z
5:rtkur k 9:ITt t
Ala
gedertifiT
*cf-47 t, 94: w ,Z7V Atha affT I
it qtY 4f#w
94T W7 7r-T
419sa k nt art T1FW #
07 TT 47 Wa MTT t, 9.77
aft 3k 914711977 39T19 t 4740 67T97T ivca t 14 9f7 aT 7th Z7T-
14717 41
mff as
th 47177 7*7 cliteffala 71711 t 1414
1. "I do not know of any Hindu writer previous to Gaudapada
who attempted to give an exposition of the monistic
doctrine (apart from Upanishads) either by writing
a commentary as did Sankara or by writing an indepen-
dent work as did Gaudapada."A History of India
Philosophy, V. I , P. 422.
R. FrRirei ATM, p 9
0
*t
I
zotOd1t4+14:
ER
T4TeITI tat WM gAcu WU.
if,
warii' t — t —
TIT 744711771)