CR
qtrw.q..r4fq
such an expression inconsistent as it is connot be employed."t
WO zit staa'
flat t
ry
;MOTIF!
gum # Kra wath* f
a&
td
TT the 4149T I 7T W4 F/Tff 4a F414 4TTFx 44441
4
mat
0
FA-44MT T). FthWT2 TTM. t
Ktrtt SFr
flgT7 TT aro
uT
tie
fcm.r
g
ag
wqk t
`4arlay zrg aT
4T491
(car writ)
gni
Nam aala aarzi
3-
Mfg' satin cf-CFq
AFT
%thf7 Rfl Ti
gar< r Y
glth I WO Ziff? PITT
crdaT
t
RITMITTEW
11-14R R754 TITRI
gelfzIT
qir
cliTt-ZTTIT 1117 W79T t 0 14 ATTT
f44 nIPPTO 4
Ow
ftgra.1 Wray zrg
Fta2 (t
MaT fi arra-4814 TT
zrg arra'.
Ti
g t arir
Rat t c
ffth4 4fg t U.41
wafr gi •77r 4
.stichr
444T MIK M 1
4#RIT Z*4 FETTMITTF4 TT 21414thl- 49.: V414 # urn
3Fliff
9;rirt-wrziara a r srrita 3Fr
WTFq #
array
WraT t I
ig4T- 44i4 * fa
farrrrarakmscrarvrTasfra:
iv
at
sra
yTk r
Tfgar t fwzrr a vr ar viria ar4 ark 4 (czi
at
wcrf9.
g4)
srura zrr
1
aro
are iTt
thrzr arffr t fa
wgi a'irfay srfrmziara (mug.
Of M4 TT a791-9) ar Wrth1144 th the
EFT Te I 47F1 4#1iTT * etRt
fErztal a
a
.
#
0
To
4T44T tint BT T).
1.
Idid
-
4
-
1
-
15.
R.
'arthsR4Z414Srl W.!.1 if: I RIM To
'
-
R
-
NC
3. The Naiyayika concedes that a complete destruction of
the previous substances will make the formation of the new
impossible. It follows that the substance only relinquishes its
former condition though the Naiyayaka is not inclined to
accept it openly." Indian Philosophy, Vol. 2, P. 97,
—Dr. S. Radha Krishnan.
Y.
irtrizty
w
t —t —t